<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tube Amp Network | Joe | Activity</title>
	<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/members/joeclark/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://tubeampnetwork.com/members/joeclark/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Joe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5c93f85ef780c1545c5f2b4950e05fcf</guid>
				<title>Joe started the topic Speaker Talk - Array or Not To Array in the forum Speaker Talk</title>
				<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/forums/topic/speaker-talk-array-or-not-to-array/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:17:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyways I recently just revamped my sound system which i feel offers enough bass / power for my events usually 150 or less. My current system consist of<br />
2 JBL PRX 715 XLF subs (56lbs and size were the deciding factors)<br />
2 EV ZLX 12P (I was being cheap and didn&#8217;t want to pay for QSCs)<br />
2 QSC K10 (stopped being cheap and kept the ZLX anyways even&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4555"><a href="https://tubeampnetwork.com/forums/topic/speaker-talk-array-or-not-to-array/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">748f8b650923b42287d4fafcbb945d5f</guid>
				<title>Joe started the topic Signaltap Effects Design Operation! in the forum Effects Design and Construction</title>
				<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/forums/topic/signaltap-effects-design-operation/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:15:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a design in Verilog. The design works normally with signaltap enabled. But, when I disable signaltap, the operation of the circuit changes. The results become erroneous. I think signaltap is an observer only, so it shouldn&#8217;t change the design operation.  Does anyone have an idea about this problem?</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t find the right&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4554"><a href="https://tubeampnetwork.com/forums/topic/signaltap-effects-design-operation/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9dc4d93674c6bfa4dd5c26603b68802</guid>
				<title>Joe became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/activity/p/4552/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:09:27 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>