<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tube Amp Network | Reggi | Activity</title>
	<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/members/regginason/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://tubeampnetwork.com/members/regginason/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Reggi.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dbd0d42d56a8a2b03c461ce9c0eb54f4</guid>
				<title>Reggi replied to the topic Hammond PT for a Two-Stroke (Rev 2) Amp? in the forum 2 Stroke Amplifier Design and Building</title>
				<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/forums/topic/hammond-pt-for-a-two-stroke-rev-2-amp/#post-8012</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:24:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230;the Hammond 200 is fine. There have been reports that the 200 series can run hot, and can even buzz IIRC, so if you are the type who wants extra quality and is willing to spend more to get it, then the 300 series is better. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fd5425af3b5d6b838cda2f0723705326</guid>
				<title>Reggi became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://tubeampnetwork.com/activity/p/4618/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:20:07 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>